Nazzaro Scarpa v. Larry E. Dubois, Etc.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
This appeal requires that we address an important question, not authoritatively resolved by controlling precedent: When (if ever) does defense counsel’s substandard performance in a criminal case — never a pretty sight — become so unattractive that a habeas court must forgo the customary inquiry into the harmful effects of attorney error and, instead, conclusively presume that counsel’s blunders prejudiced the defendant?
The question arises in the following context. Petitioner-appellee Nazzaro Scarpa brought a pro se application for habeas corpus in the federal district…
2Cases cited83 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by341 opinions
- Eric Allen Peterson v. Robert LampertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- George Lindstadt v. John P. Keane, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- People v. ColemanIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
- David v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- O'Brien v. DuboisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
336 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.