Legal Opinion

Sharp v. Pittsburg Coca Cola Bottling Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 9, 1957No. 40,443PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Robb, J.:

This was an action based on breach of an implied warranty to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff as a result of consuming a swallow from a bottle of car*846bonated beverage containing foreign substances. Plaintiff recovered and defendant appeals.

On April 26, 1954, plaintiff, a woman sixty-eight years of age, while cleaning the offices of a doctor in the Globe Building at Pittsburg, purchased a bottle of Coca Cola (which had been bottled in defendant’s plant) from a dispensing machine that was owned, serviced, and operated…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Nichols v. NoldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  2. Parks v. C. C. Yost Pie Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  3. Swengel v. F. & E. Wholesale Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  4. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. MillikenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  5. Leinbach v. Pickwick Greyhound LinesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Manzoni v. Detroit Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Professional Lens Plan, Inc. v. Polaris Leasing Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  3. Simmons v. Wichita Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  4. Chandler v. Anchor Serum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  5. Butterfield v. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API