Legal Opinion

Butterfield v. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 19, 1972No. 46,443PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion o£ the court was delivered by

Harman, C.:

In this action for damages for personal injury arising from a bursting soda water bottle plaintiff Corine M. Butterfield seeks recovery from defendant Pepsi-Cola Bottling Company of Wichita, Inc., for breach of implied warranty of fitness. Judgment was entered against plaintiff as a result of a jury’s adverse finding on this issue and she has appealed.

Plaintiff-appellant’s evidence at trial revealed the following:

She owned and operated a small grocery store in Milan, Kansas. Defendant-appellee bottled and distributed soft drinks, including…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Nichols v. NoldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  2. Gardner v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Minnesota, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  3. Swengel v. F. & E. Wholesale Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  4. Evangelist v. Bellern Research CorporationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  5. Kirkendoll v. NeustromCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Hodges v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  2. Brooks v. DietzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  3. Black v. Don Schmid Motor, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  4. Giant Food, Inc. v. Washington Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  5. Wilcheck v. Doonan Truck & Equipment, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API