Legal Opinion

Cohen v. Silverman

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 17, 1922No. 23,025PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallam, J.

Plaintiff was riding as a gratuitous passenger in an automobile driven by defendant Silverman. Tbe car came into collision with a truck of defendant Beck. In tbe collision plaintiff was injured and sued both Silverman and Beck for damages. At tbe conclusion of plaintiff’s case tbe court directed a verdict in favor of defendant Beck. Tbe case proceeded against defendant Silverman and the jury found a verdict against him. Defendant Silverman appeals.

Defendant Silverman contends that tbe evidence is insufficient to warrant a finding that be was negligent. We think tbe evidence is sufficient.

Silve…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Schaar v. ConforthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  2. Armstead v. LounsberrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  3. Everart v. FischerOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Peterson v. City of Red WingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  5. Adams v. City of Thief River FallsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dohm v. R. N. Cardozo BrotherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  2. Mechler v. McMahonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  3. Thelen v. SpilmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  4. Suess v. Arrowhead Steel Products Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  5. Bartley v. FritzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API