H. A. Steen Industries, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Menceb,
We have for onr consideration appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County which directed that a variance be granted for the erection of a sign and that the variance provide “for maximum compliance with the zoning ordinance as is possible.”
The following preceded the order in question. In 1976, H. A. Steen Industries, Inc. (Steen) purchased an irregularly shaped triangular piece of property with side dimensions of 25 feet, 105 feet, and 108 feet. Steen’s reason for this purchase was for the erection of a billboard on this vacant, landlocked lot. The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Richman v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Ferry v. KownackiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Jacquelin v. Horsham TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Nicholson v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Magrann v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re Variance by AvanzatoCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Appeal of the Board of Supervisors v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Borough of Emmaus v. SCHULERCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- In re Appeal of Buckingham Developers, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- H. A. Steen Industries, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.