Legal Opinion
State v. Amoroso
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided March 4, 1999No. 971712-CAPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BILLINGS, Judge:
¶ 1 Appellant, the State of Utah, appeals an order dismissing a criminal prosecution against Appellees Louis A. Amoroso and Beer Across America (BAA) involving several violations of Utah liquor laws. 1 We reverse and remand.
FACTS
¶ 2 BAA is a national marketer of several products, including “heavy” beer, which qualifies as “liquor” under Utah liquor laws. BAA is located in Illinois. It has no property in Utah, maintains no representatives here, nor does it directly solicit sales in Utah. However, BAA advertises nationally, including in Utah, via the Internet and…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. New York State Liquor AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Capital Cities Cable, Inc. v. CrispSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. DunnUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- Strassheim v. DailySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In re NajawiczSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2009
- State v. HolmUtah Supreme Court · 2006
- U.P.C., Inc. v. R.O.A. General, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1999
- State v. HorrocksCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2001
- WDIS v. Hi-CountryUtah Supreme Court · 2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.