Legal Opinion

Sussel v. City & County of Honolulu Civil Service Commission

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1989No. NOS. 13430 & 13484PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

NAKAMURA, J.

The question in this interlocutory appeal and cross-appeal from the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction entered by the Circuit Court of the First Circuit is whether “actual bias” or “an appearance of impropriety” should be the test for disqualifying a member of the civil service commission whose impartiality has been challenged by the public employee who brought an appeal from an adverse action by his employing authority. Because an impartial tribunal is an…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. Gibson v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re Water Use Permit ApplicationsHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. RossHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Sifagaloa v. Board of Trustees of the Employees' Retirement SystemHawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Regan v. State Board of Chiropractic ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  5. Mauna Kea Anaina Hou v. Board of Land & Natural ResourcesHawaii Supreme Court · 2015

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API