Legal Opinion

Crawford v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 27, 1978No. [No. 85, September Term, 1977.]PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, C. J.

The sixth amendment right of an accused in a criminal case to confront the witnesses against him is a fundamental constitutional right made obligatory on the states by the fourteenth amendment to the federal constitution. 1 Dutton v. Evans, 400 U. S. 74, 91 S. Ct. 210, 27 L.Ed.2d 213 (1970); Pointer v. Texas, 380 U. S. 400, 85 S. Ct. 1065, 13 L.Ed.2d 923 (1965). The same right is secured by Art. 21 of the Maryland Declaration of Rights. 2 State v. Collins, 265 Md. 70, 288 A. 2d 163 (1972). The issue presented in this case is whether the appellant Crawford was denied his constitutional right…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Coleman v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Grandison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  2. Wildermuth v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  3. Huffington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  4. Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  5. Tichnell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API