Legal Opinion
Curtis v. Harry Winston, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 23, 1987No. 86 Civ. 2899 (VLB)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
VINCENT L. BRODERICK, District Judge.
Defendant Harry Winston, Inc. (“Winston”), a New York corporation engaged in the business of manufacturing and distributing high quality precious stones, with its principal place of business in New York, has moved pursuant to F.R. Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) 1 to dismiss the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. For the rea-' sons set forth below, the motion is denied.
I
Plaintiff George Curtis (“Curtis”) was hired in New York by Winston on February 2, 1977, to…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Goldman v. BeldenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Day & Zimmermann, Inc. v. ChallonerSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- North Shore Bottling Co. v. C. Schmidt & Sons, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Sinva, Inc. v. Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Intercontinental Hotels Corp. v. GoldenNew York Court of Appeals · 1964
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Tischmann v. ITT/Sheraton Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Canet v. Gooch Ware TravelsteadDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1996
- Republic of the Philippines v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1991
- Majorica, S.A. v. Majorca International, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Veitz v. Unisys Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.