Legal Opinion

Veitz v. Unisys Corp.

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided November 17, 1987No. Civ. A. 87-24-NPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DOUMAR, District Judge.

This matter concerns Count Three of the plaintiff’s complaint, in which the plaintiff alleges he has rights to benefits under Saudi Arabian law for overtime work he performed in Saudi Arabia. For reasons set forth below, this Court DENIES defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Count Three of Plaintiff’s Complaint or in the Alternative for Summary Judgment, as well as plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment and for Summary Judgment. The Court does find, however, that under Count III certain portions of the claim are barred by the statute of limitations of Saudi Arabia.

In the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Burnett v. GrattanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Jimmy P. Davis, as of the Estate of Dallas D. Hardy, Jr., Deceased v. Piper Aircraft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980
  5. Thomas v. Washington Gas Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Seismic Reservoir 2020, Inc. v. PaulssonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  2. Republic of the Philippines v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1991
  3. Ali v. Al-FaisalCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API