Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Wilmoth

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1879PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Erom the Benton Cii-cuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtNiblack, J.

Action by Joel C. Wilmoth, against Richard Manke, William Fisher, John Fisher and Jacob Fisher, for failure to pay a promissory note. The complaint was in five paragraphs.

Demurrers were overruled to the first, second and fifth paragraphs, and sustained as to the third and fourth.

There was a return of “ not found,” as to William Fisher, and Manke made default. John Fisher and Jacob Fisher answered in general denial. There was a verdict for the plaintiff, a motion for a new trial, and judgment on the verdict.

Errors are severally assigned by John Fisher and Jacob Fisher, the only appellants…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Miller v. BillingslyIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Davis v. CallowayIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Helms v. KearnsIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Luark v. MaloneIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
  5. Crawford v. KingIndiana Supreme Court · 1876

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Clodfelter v. HulettIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Wolke v. FlemingIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Pence v. ArmstrongIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Harrison v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Rodenbarger v. BramblettIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API