Legal Opinion
United States v. South Florida Water Management District
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided September 23, 2003No. 88-1886CIVZLOCHPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER OF DISQUALIFICATION
ZLOCH, Chief Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court upon Intervenor, United States Sugar Corp.’s Motion To Disqualify, To Have This Motion Referred To the Chief Judge, To Vacate May 9, 2003 Order And To Stay Proceedings (DE 1742), Intervenor, Miccosukee Tribe Of Indians Of Florida’s Motion To Strike Affidavit Of Charles F. Wilson, Jr. (DE 1761) and the Order of Referral (DE 1772) signed by United States District Court Judge William M. Hoeveler. The Court has given considerable thought to said Motions, the entire court file and is otherwise fully advised in the premises.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Terence George KellyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Harris v. Geico General InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2013
- Bettis v. TOYS" R" USDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2009
- Centennial Bank v. ServisFirst Bank Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2020
- PACHACUTEC v. CITY OF FORSYTHDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2025