Legal Opinion
United States v. Bernard D. Reicher
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 29, 1992No. 91-2282PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOGAN, Circuit Judge.
Defendant Bernard D. Reicher was convicted by a jury of conspiring to rig bids in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1. Although the district court denied defendant’s motion for dismissal of the Sherman Act count at the close of all the evidence, it subsequently reversed its position and granted defendant’s motion for judgment of acquittal after discharge of the jury pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 29(c). The decision of the district court is reported as United States v. Reicher, 777 F.Supp. 901 (D.N.M.1991). The United States has appealed.
Reicher was indicted…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Board of Trade of Chicago v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- United States v. Portsmouth Paving Corporation and R. Curtis Saunders, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Mobile Materials, Inc. And Gerald O. PhilpotCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States of America, and v. Daniel Santistevan, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- L-3 Communications Corp. v. Jaxon Engineering & Maintenance, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2012
- Amos v. Aspen Alps 123, LLCSupreme Court of Colorado · 2012
- United States v. James P. HeffernanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.