Legal Opinion
Amos v. Aspen Alps 123, LLC
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided June 18, 2012No. 10SC187PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice
11 In this appeal, we address whether a failure to strictly comply with C.R.C.P. 120's notice requirements mandates setting aside a completed foreclosure sale. We conclude that when the parties received actual notice which afforded them an opportunity to present their objections and no prejudice resulted, we will not disturb a completed foreclosure sale. Accordingly, we affirm the court of appeals' judgment with respect to Rule 120 notification.
12 We also examine whether the principals of Aspen Alps 128, LLC (Aspen Alps) engaged in bid rigging in violation of the Colorado Antitrust Act,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- A.C. Excavating v. Yacht Club II Homeowners Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- United States v. Koppers Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Gloria Baker v. Latham Sparrowbush Associates and Aaron KozakCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- United States v. W.F. Brinkley & Son Construction Company, Inc. And William F. Brinkley, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Jordan v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
- In re P.W. v. Children's Hospital ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
- People v. HoskinSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
- People v. HoggardColorado Court of Appeals · 2017
- Dill v. Rembrandt Group, IncColorado Court of Appeals · 2020
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.