Legal Opinion
State v. Stitzel
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 17, 1984No. C3-84-373PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
This is an appeal by the state of a pretrial order dismissing a misdemeanor assault charge for denial of defendant’s right to a speedy trial. We affirm.
FACTS
On November 6, 1982, respondent Larry Stitzel allegedly struck an individual. Respondent first appeared in court on May 19, 1983. Acting pro se he moved for dismissal based on denial of his right to a speedy trial. His motion was denied and he pled not guilty. A pretrial date was set for August 15, 1983; respondent appeared with his attorney and again requested dismissal for lack of a speedy trial. The prosecutor…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. BrouilletteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- State v. CoraritoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- State v. RossbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. RenardCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
- State v. BrookeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- State v. LarsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- State v. SistrunkCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.