Legal Opinion

State v. Sistrunk

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 20, 1988No. C7-88-157PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KALITOWSKI, Judge

Appeal arises from the trial court’s dismissal of respondent’s indictment for first degree murder for failure to bring this matter to a speedy trial.

FACTS

Respondent/defendant, Anthony Richard Sistrunk, a/k/a James Mead, a/k/a Tony Mead, was convicted of murder in Salem County, New Jersey and confined at Yard-ville Correctional Center from March 1972 until December 1974 when he escaped.

In January 1975, while a fugitive from justice, respondent was an accomplice to a murder committed in the state of New York.

In September 1975, a warrant was issued from California for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Moore v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. State v. StitzelCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. State v. BrookeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  5. STATE OF MINN., CITY OF LITTLE CANADA v. RachieCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State of Minnesota v. David Ernest OsorioCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
  2. State v. StrobelCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API