Legal Opinion

Wright v. Keith

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 5, 1932No. 30,744PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hutchison, J.:

This is a compensation case, and the appeal is by the respondent from a judgment in favor of the workman for injuries sustained by him on account of the accidental freezing of his right foot while engaged with other workmen in erecting for respondent an oil-well derrick.

The first point urged by the appellant is that the injuries sustained *394were not the result of an accident, and that they did not arise out of and in the course of the employment.

The trial court made very full and complete findings of fact and three conclusions of law, the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gilliland v. Ash Grove Lime & Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  2. Monson v. BattelleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  3. Taylor v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  4. Barker v. Shell Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  5. State ex rel. Virginia & Rainy Lake Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Murphy v. I. C. U. Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1944
  2. El Dorado Refining Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  3. Meldrum v. Southard Feed & Mill Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API