Time Finance Corp. v. Clark
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtDearington, J.
In its action the plaintiff sought to recover a balance due on a promissory note upon which, it claimed, the defendants, husband and wife, were obligated, jointly and severally. In their answer the defendants, by way of a special defense, allege that the obligation was discharged by a discharge in bankruptcy, which defense the plaintiff denied on the ground that the debt was incurred through a materially false financial statement of the financial condition of the defendants and was, therefore, not dischargeable under § 17a (2) of the federal Bankruptcy Act.' 74 Stat. 409,11 U.S.C. § 35 (a)…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Martin v. KavanewskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Banks v. Siegel. Matter of BanksCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
- Helming v. KashakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Sherwood v. SalmonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1813
- Yates v. BotelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re SewellDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1973
- Superior Loan Corporation of Buffalo v. RobieMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
- Paull v. CoughlinConnecticut Superior Court · 1983
- Paull v. CoughlinConnecticut Superior Court · 1983