Legal Opinion

Paull v. Coughlin

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided August 5, 1983No. FILE No. 1422PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBieluch, J.

The plaintiff instituted this action to recover damages in connection with her purchase of a 1974 Peugeot from the defendant.

In September, 1979, the defendant advertised her car for sale in a local newspaper, stating that it was in “excellent condition” and setting the sale price at $3500. In response to that advertisement, the plaintiff and her husband contacted the defendant, met with her and test drove the car. The plaintiff then offered to buy the car for $3500. Prior to completing the transaction on October 3,1979, the plaintiff’s husband also spoke with the defendant’s mechanic who had…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Verrastro v. SivertsenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Johnson v. HealySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  3. Time Finance Corp. v. ClarkConnecticut Appellate Court · 1969

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kikuchi v. BrownHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Gay v. Peoples BankNorth Carolina Business Court · 2016
  3. Regulbuto v. General Health Management, No. 0371842s (Jan. 29, 1991)Connecticut Superior Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API