Legal Opinion

Quamme v. Jodsaas

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1998No. 98-127PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hunt

¶1 Plaintiff Deanna S. Quamme appeals an order of the District Court for the Fourth Judicial District, Missoula County, dismissing her claim for failing to meet the requirements of Rule 41(e), M.R.Civ.P. We reverse.

¶2 The following issues are raised on appeal:

¶3 1. Does this Court have jurisdiction over the appeal in this case when Quamme filed the notice of appeal prior to the disposition of her motion to amend the court’s judgment?

¶4 2. Did the District Court err when it dismissed Quamme’s claims for improper service of summons?

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶5 On January 8,1996, Quamme…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rocky Mountain Enterprises, Inc. v. Pierce FlooringMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Haugen v. Blaine Bank of MontanaMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Yarborough v. Glacier CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Schmitz v. VasquezMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Eddleman v. Aetna Life InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1998

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Otto v. Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife & ParksMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  2. McDonald v. JacobsenMontana Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Otto v. Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife & ParksMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Quamme v. JodsaasMontana Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API