De Camp Lumber Co. v. Tolhurst
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a portion of a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, directing the payment of costs and attorneys’ fees. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C.
In September, 1891, John A. McCarty entered into a written contract with Shelley H. Tolhurst, appellant, to furnish the materials and construct for him on a lot in the city of Los Angeles a dwelling-house, with fences and other structures, for the sum of $2,275. The contract was duly recorded and by its terms twenty-five per cent of the *633whole contract price was made payable thirty-five days after its final completion.
The De Camp Lumber Company, respondent, under contract with McCarty, furnished materials which were used in die construction of the building, of the value of…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Wilson v. NugentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Acoustic Specialties, Inc. v. WrightIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
- Los Angeles Pressed Brick Co. v. HigginsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- Bouten Construction Co. v. M & L Land Co.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1994
- Stockton Lumber Co. v. SchulerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.