Legal Opinion

State v. Bergfeldt

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1905No. 5665PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Snell, J., entered October 12, 1904, upon stipulated facts, adjudging the defendant guilty of the offense of carrying on the business of barbering on, Sunday.

1Per curiam

The defendant was informed against for the crime of carrying on the business of barbering on Sunday, in violation of the act of March 7th, 1903, Laws 1903, p. 68. A demurrer interposed to the information was overruled. Thereafter the case was submitted to the court on an agreed statement of facts. The agreed statement admitted facts constituting a violation of the act, and set forth, by way of defense, that the defendant is a Seventh-Day Adventist, and conscientiously observes the seventh day of the week, commonly called Saturday, and performs no labor of any kind on that day; that he…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. . HavnorNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Petit v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Ex parte JentzschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Eden v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  5. People v. BelletMichigan Supreme Court · 1894

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. County of Spokane v. Valu-Mart, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1966
  3. In re DonnellanWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Armstrong v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  5. City of Seattle v. GervasiWashington Supreme Court · 1927

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API