Central Florida Lumber Co. v. Taylor-Moore Syndicate, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BRYAN, Cireuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above).
There was a misjoinder of parties. The Leach Syndicate was interested only in the recovery of $25,000 which it paid for the original option for thirty days. The assignee syndicates claimed $75,000 upon the subsequent payments, and an additional sum as attorney’s fee. The three syndicates did not have a claim in common to the amount sued for. But it may be assumed that the misjoinder would not be fatal if the suit had been of such nature as to confer jurisdiction in equity. United States v. American Bell Telephone Co., 128 U. S. 315, 352,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Whitehead v. ShattuckSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Pusey & Jones Co. v. HanssenSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Buzard v. HoustonSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- United States v. American Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Brown v. Lake Superior Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wenzel & Henoch Const. Co. v. Metropolitan Water Dist.District Court, S.D. California · 1937
- Sanderson v. Postal Life Ins. Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
- American Cyanamid Co. v. Wilson & Toomer Fertilizer Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
- Manuel Alegre v. Marine Motor Sales Corporation, DebtorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
- Manuel Alegre v. Marine Motor Sales Corporation, DebtorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.