Legal Opinion
American Cyanamid Co. v. Wilson & Toomer Fertilizer Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided January 26, 1933No. 6611PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.
Wilson & Toomer Fertilizer Company on August 22, 1924, sued American Cyanamid Company at law to recover overcharges beginning in 1918 on a written contract for the sale of phosphate rock made with Amalgamated Phosphate Company, claiming that the Cyanamid Company had become bound by adoption, or by estoppel to deny adoption, of the Amalgamated Company’s contract. On the first trial the verdict was directed for the Cyanamid Company, and tho direction reversed. (C. C. A.) 33 F.(2d) 812. On a second trial the verdict was directed the other way, and again reversed. (C. C. A.)…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Dickerson v. ColgroveSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Buzard v. HoustonSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Liberty Oil Co. v. Condon National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- American Mills Co. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Raytheon Mfg. Co. v. Radio Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1935
- City of Orlando v. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935
- Highway Engineering & Construction Co. v. Hillsborough CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
- Church v. HubbardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937
- Dunn v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1934