Legal Opinion
Schneider v. Rusk
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 18, 1963No. 251PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Per curiam
Trial of this case should have been before a three-judge District Court convened pursuant to 28 U. S. C. §§ 2282, 2284, as petitioner requested. Her complaint explicitly-sought an -“injunction restraining the enforcement, operation or execution of . . . [an] Act of Congress” — § 352 (a)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, 8 U. S. C. § 1484 (a)(1), which provides that a natural ized American citizen shall lose his nationality by “having a continuous residence for three years in the territory of a foreign state of which he was formerly a national or in which the place of his…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Trop v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Ex Parte PoreskySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp. v. EpsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Stratton v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Perez v. BrownellSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Zemel v. RuskSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Schneider v. RuskSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Juan Rigores Sardino v. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York and the Secretary of the Treasury of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Robert H. Hargrave v. Shellie McKinneyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Green v. Board of ElectionsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.