New York v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.
District Court, N.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
HOMER, United States Magistrate Judge.
Presently pending is the motion of defendant Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation (“Niagara Mohawk”) for leave to file an amended answer to assert claims for contribution against co-defendant M. Wallace and Son, Inc. (“Wallace Company”) as well as declaratory and injunctive relief. Docket No. 70. Niagara Mohawk also seeks leave to implead Arthur M. Wallace and Sidney R. Wallace (“the Wallaces”), the principals of Wallace Company. Id. Wallace Company opposes the motion. Docket No. 75. For the reasons which follow, the motion is…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Mary C. Quaratino v. Tiffany & Co., Michael Eiring, and David WrightCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Matima v. CelliCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Lettie D. Evans v. Syracuse City School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Grace v. RosenstockCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.