Legal Opinion
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles Roy RAMBO, Defendant-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 25, 1996No. 94-30426PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge BEEZER.
BEEZER, Circuit Judge:
Charles Roy Rambo appeals his convictions of one count each of unlawful possession of a firearm and possession of an unregistered silencer. 18 U.S.C. § 922(o); 26 U.S.C. §§ 5841, 5861(d), 5871. He challenges his conviction for unlawful possession of a firearm on the ground that 18 U.S.C. § 922(o) is unconstitutional. He also argues that the district court erred in denying his motions: (1) to suppress evidence discovered during a search; (2) to suppress statements made by Rambo to the police; (3) to dismiss the indictment because of government…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- United States v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
- United States v. Raymond Rybar, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- United States v. John W. KenneyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- United States v. D.F.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Robert Franklyn, Also Known as Robert Franklin, and Ralph Gonzalez, Also Known as Raphael QuinonesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.