Legal Opinion

Hochmuth v. Norton

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 28, 1932No. 12,579PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mn. Justice Burke

delivered the opinion of the court.

These parties occupied the same relative position in the trial court and are hereinafter designated as there.

But two questions deserving’ consideration are presented by this record: (1) Was the question of the validity of defendants’ tax deed before the trial court? (2) Was the deed void on its face?

Plaintiff brought ejectment to recover possession of two lots in Denver. By a second cause of action he demanded compensation for their retention. A demurrer for want of facts and ambiguity was overruled. The answer denied every material…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Page v. GillettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
  2. Hamer v. Glenn Investment Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1924
  3. Kingore v. WallaceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
  4. Hughes v. WebsterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1912

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lake Canal Reservoir Co. v. BeetheSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
  2. City & County of Denver v. BachSupreme Court of Colorado · 1933
  3. Sierra Mining Co. v. LuceroSupreme Court of Colorado · 1948
  4. Timroth v. OkenColorado Court of Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API