Legal Opinion · Dissent

John T. Amend v. 485 Properties, LLC

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided March 22, 2006No. 04-14635Published

Non-Argument Calendar.

1DissentBenham, Justice

Contrary to the majority, I see “procuring cause” as a limitation on recovery and not as an explicit element of a quantum meruit claim. I read the cases cited by the majority in support of its position as actually supporting the position I espouse — the “long-held rule” is that procuring cause is a necessary ingredient in an action based on a contract brought by a real estate broker who had an express or exclusive contract to buy, sell, or lease certain property and the broker sued for the promised commission when the property owner closed the deal without the broker. In fact, it is the more…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Perimeter Realty v. Gapi, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  2. Sharp-Boylston Co. v. LundeenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  3. Graves v. HunnicuttCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
  4. Wilcox v. WilcoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  5. Lifestyle Family, L.P. v. Lawyers Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API