Legal Opinion
Great American Insurance Agency v. United Parcel Service
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 20, 2004PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Diane A. Lebedeff, J.
*302Significant legal changes have impacted the once settled area of law relating to the tariffs of many interstate common carriers, and those changes bear upon the disposition of this summary judgment motion by defendant United Parcel Service (UPS).
The facts are simple. Plaintiff alleges that, in September of 1998, its insured, the subrogor, delivered two packages of jewelry, including diamond rings, to UPS for delivery in New York to defendant European Gemological Labs. When delivered, one package was “empty and without its contents,” and bore signs it…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Friends of Animals, Inc. v. Associated Fur Manufacturers, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Central Office Telephone, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Morlee Sales Corp. v. Manufacturers Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1961
- Tempel Steel Corporation v. Landstar Inway, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Great Am. Ins. Agency v. United Parcel Serv.New York Supreme Court, New York County · 2004