Legal Opinion

Gula v. Gula

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 7, 1988No. 696PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPOVICH, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order entered on February 9, 1988 by the Schuylkill County Court of Common Pleas which dismissed the appellant’s exceptions to the Master’s report and adopted his recommendation that the parties’ 1971 ante-nuptial agreement is valid and enforceable. 1 We affirm.

Herein, the appellant, Joan Gula, alleges that the parties’ ante-nuptial agreement is invalid and unenforceable because: 1) the agreement did not make reasonable provision for her; and 2) the agreement did not make a full and fair disclosure. More specifically, she alleges that the agreement…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hillegass EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Kaufmann EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Simeone v. SimeoneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. In Re Estate of GeyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Laub v. LaubSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sneeringer v. SneeringerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Cullen v. Cullen, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Monroe County2004
  3. Ford v. Ford, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API