Legal Opinion

State v. Hortman

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 30, 1994No. 32979-1-IPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKennedy, J.

The State of Washington appeals the trial court’s imposition of an exceptional sentence below the standard range, contending that the trial court erred in applying the rationale of State v. Sanchez, 69 Wn. App. 255, 848 P.2d 208, review denied, 122 Wn.2d 1007 (1993). The State asks this court to reject Sanchez, arguing that the decision is legally unsound, that it allows trial courts to dictate police investigatory procedures which do not amount to misconduct and do not violate due process, and that it impermissibly allows trial courts to restrict prosecutorial discretion. We find Sanchez to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. LewisWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. AllertWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. SanchezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  4. State v. WileyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. McGillCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  2. State v. McGillCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  3. State v. McCollumCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  4. State v. CalvertCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  5. State v. KinnemanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API