People v. Sykes
Michigan Supreme Court
Exceptions before sentence from Ionia. (Smith, J.) Respondent was convicted of engaging in the business of selling intoxicating liquors at retail without paying the required tax. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
There is no disputed question of fact in this case. ' May 2, 1892, one Michael Snyder paid to the county treasurer of Ionia county $500 as a tax, as required by law, for the purpose of carrying on the business at retail of selling spirituous liquors. Ho gave the required bond. He continued in business until August 26, 1892, when he died, leaving his wife, Mary Snyder, and two children, surviving him. His wife was appointed administratrix of his estate, *454consisting of about $300 of personal property. After her appointment as administratrix, Mrs. Snyder continued to carry on the business, and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Attorney General v. HuebnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by3 opinions
- State ex rel. Rich v. SteinerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
- Hartingh v. Bay Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- McCabe v. Township BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1914