Legal Opinion

Attorney General v. Huebner

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1892PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Mandamus. Relator applied for mandamus to compel the respondent to refrain from receiving and receipting for liquor taxes before the filing of the statutory bond. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Per curiam

This is an application for a mandamus, directing the county treasurer to refrain from receiving and receipting for a liquor tax before the filing of the bond required by statute.

Respondent contends that there is no provision of the statute requiring the approval and filing of the bond to-precede the issuing of the receipt for the tax. It is true that theje is no express provision_ to that effect. The statute, however, prohibits the applicant from engaging in the saloon business until the bond is approved by the proper body, and filed with the county treasurer, the tax paid, etc.

The simple…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rode v. PhelpsMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. WadeMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Gowan v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  3. People v. SykesMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API