Legal Opinion

Nixon v. Sampson

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided January 31, 1975No. Civ. A. 74-1518, 74-1533, and 74-1551PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

These consolidated cases present a unique controversy, the heart of which concerns the ownership of and the right to assert or waive privilege with respect to the “Presidential materials and tape-recorded conversations” 1 of the Nixon Administration.

The suits comprise the following actions : a suit by former President Richard M. Nixon (C.A. No. 74-1518) for injunctive relief and a writ of mandamus against Arthur F. Sampson, the Administrator of General Services; Philip W. Buchen, counsel to President Gerald R. Ford; . and H.…

2Cases cited79 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Administrator of General ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Moore v. AspinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
  3. In Re Franklin National Bank Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1979
  4. Richard Nixon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
  5. Nixon v. Administrator of General ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1976

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API