Legal Opinion

Adams v. Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 11, 2007No. C 06-05428 MHPPublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

PATEL, District Judge.

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Approval of Hoffmann-La Roche Notice

On September 5, 2006 plaintiffs Roy Adams (“Adams”), Robert Eggert (“Eg-gert”), Michael Ferris (“Ferris”), Ed Hall (“Hall”) and Rohit Singh (“Singh”) (collectively “plaintiffs”) filed this putative collective action against defendant Inter-Con Security Systems (“Inter-Con”) for alleged violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. section 201 et seq.; California Labor Code sections 201-204, 226, 510, 1174, 1174.5 and 1194; California Wage Order Number 4 and California Business…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Baldwin County Welcome Center v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Hipp v. Liberty National Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Millan v. Cascade Water Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2015
  2. Murillo v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2010
  3. Amendola v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
  4. Harris v. Vector Marketing Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2010
  5. Woodard v. Fedex Freight East, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2008

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API