Legal Opinion

In Re Cardassi

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided December 1, 1972No. Civ. A. 15346PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

NEWMAN, District Judge.

This is an application by the Government for an order to compel a grand jury witness to answer questions after the witness has been accorded use immunity pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 6003. The issue is whether and in what circumstances a witness given use immunity by a federal court may invoke the self-inerimination privilege of the Fifth Amendment as a safeguard against foreign prosecution.

The witness appeared pursuant to subpoena before a session of the federal grand jury for the District of Connecticut at New Haven on September 25, 1972. She was…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Korematsu v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Zicarelli v. New Jersey State Commission of InvestigationSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. In Re Grand Jury Subpoena of Martin Flanagan. United States of America v. Martin FlanaganCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  2. Environmental Tectonics v. W.S. Kirkpatrick, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  3. United States v. Vytautas GecasCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  4. United States v. Michael Kazuo Yanagita and Marc Choyei KondoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  5. United States v. (Under Seal)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API