Legal Opinion
United States v. Lewis M. Dischner, United States of America v. Carl W. Mathisen
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 11, 1992No. 89-30333, 89-30334PublishedCited by 132 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed April 3, 1992 (960 F.2d 870) is amended as follows:
With the above amendments, the panel has voted to deny the petitions for rehearing and to reject the suggestions for rehearing en banc.
The full court has been advised of the suggestions for rehearing en banc, and no judge of the court has requested a vote on them. Fed.R.App.P. 35(b).
The petitions for rehearing are DENIED and the suggestions for rehearing are REJECTED.
OPINION
RYMER, Circuit Judge:
These are consolidated appeals from convictions on jury verdicts rendered after an eight-month trial. Lewis Dischner and Carl…
2Cases cited78 opinions
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by132 opinions
- United States v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Stacey C. Koon, Cross-Appellee. United States of America v. Laurence M. Powell, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. FregaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. FrostCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Keith Daniel Williams v. Arthur Calderon, Warden, San Quentin State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.