Legal Opinion
Roland v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided October 23, 1995No. S95G0639PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Thompson, Justice.
We granted certiorari to the Court of Appeals to determine whether a homeowner’s insurance policy issued by appellee Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company (GFB) required Frances Roland, a named insured, to live at the “residence premises” at the time of the loss in order to be compensated for her claim. We conclude that it did not and reverse, in part, the judgment of the Court of Appeals in Ga. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. v. Roland, 215 Ga. App. 834 (452 SE2d 548) (1994).
Frances and Charles Roland, wife and husband, were both named insureds under the policy which…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Interstate Life & Accident Insurance v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
- Cincinnati Insurance v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Rice v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- Castellana v. Conyers Toyota, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. DeanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Duncan v. Integon General Ins. Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- Lavoi Corp. v. National Fire Insurance of HartfordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- Florida International Indemnity Co. v. OsgoodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Rm Kids, LLC v. Old Republic National Title Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
- United Services Automobile Ass'n v. CarrollCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.