Legal Opinion

STADTMILLER v. UPMC Health Plan, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 29, 2011No. Civil Action 09-884PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CONTI, District Judge.

Pending before the court is the motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 39) filed by the defendant UPMC Health Plan, Inc. (“UPMC” or the “Defendant”), with respect to claims made by Shane Stadtmiller (“Stadtmiller” or the “Plaintiff’) in his five-count, third amended complaint. (ECF No. 36). Count I is premised on the Uniformed Services Employment and Re-Employment Rights Act (“USERRA”), 38 U.S.C. § 4301-33. Count II is brought pursuant to Pennsylvania’s Military Affairs Act, as amended, 51 Pa. Con. Stat. §§ 7301 et. seq. In count III, the Plaintiff…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Belles v. Wilkes-Barre Area School DistrictDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
  2. INTERRANTE v. MERCK & CO., INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API