Legal Opinion
INTERRANTE v. MERCK & CO., INC.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 22, 2021No. 2:19-cv-00263Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA __________________________________________ WALTER INTERRANTE, : Plaintiff, : : v. : Civil No. 2:19-cv-00263-JMG : MERCK & CO., INC. : Defendant. : __________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION GALLAGHER, J. September 22, 2021 Defendant Merck & Co, Inc. (“Merck”) fired Plaintiff Walter Interrante after he jumped into an energized trash compactor. Interrante now claims that Merck violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (PHRA). Before the Court is…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Katherine L. Taylor v. Phoenixville School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Dorothy Daniels v. Philadelphia School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.