Gamroth v. Village of Jackson
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
In DNR v. City of Waukesha, 184 Wis. 2d 178, 191, 515 N.W.2d 888, 893 (1994), decided June 1, 1994, our supreme court resolved long-standing and conflicting interpretations of the notice of claim statute, § 893.80(1), Stats., by deciding that the statute applied to any action, be it tort, money damages or equity. On May 8, 1996, in State ex rel. Auchinleck v. Town of LaGrange, 200 Wis. 2d 585, 592-94, 547 N.W.2d 587, 590 (1996), the supreme court drew an exception to DNR and held that the notice of claim time limit was inapplicable to open records and open meetings actions because the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Vollmer v. LuetyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
- State Ex Rel. Auchinleck v. Town of LaGrangeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
- State Department of Natural Resources v. City of WaukeshaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
- River Bank of DeSoto v. FisherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
- Aiello v. Village of Pleasant PrairieCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
3Cited by8 opinions
- E-Z Roll Off, LLC v. County of OneidaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
- Town of Burke v. City of MadisonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
- Emjay Investment Co. v. Village of GermantownWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
- Mayek v. Cloverleaf Lakes Sanitary District 1Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000
- Nesbitt Farms, LLC v. City of MadisonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.