Legal Opinion

Town of Burke v. City of Madison

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided March 11, 1999No. 98-0108, 98-1362PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoggensack, J.

In this consolidated appeal, we address the contention that a notice of claim is not required when a town files a lawsuit pursuant to § 66.021, Stats., objecting to a city's annexation of a town's land. Because the Town of Burke brought its claims pursuant to a specific statutory scheme devised by the legislature to effect and to resolve objections to annexations in a timely fashion and because the policies which underlie § 893.80(1), Stats., would not be furthered by requiring that a notice of claim be filed prior to the Town's commencing suit, we affirm the decision of Dane County Circuit…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sweet v. BergeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
  2. Truttschel v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
  3. State Ex Rel. Auchinleck v. Town of LaGrangeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State Department of Natural Resources v. City of WaukeshaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. WhiteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Thomas F. Benson v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
  2. E-Z Roll Off, LLC v. County of OneidaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Town of Wilson v. City of SheboyganWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Gilbertson v. City of SheboyganDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2016
  5. Danielson v. City of Sun PrairieCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API