Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Calhoun

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 22, 1983No. Docket Nos. 41355, 41510PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DANIELSON, J.

Pursuant to rule 31(d), California Rules of Court, defendant, Danny Steven Calhoun, appeals from a judgment of conviction entered upon his plea of guilty. His appeal is based solely upon grounds occurring after entry of the plea and does not challenge the validity of the plea.

The People have also appealed from the staying of certain parts of the sentence.

Procedural and Factual Background

Pursuant to a plea bargain, the details of which were stated in open court, defendant entered pleas of guilty to 12 of 34 counts of a consolidated information. The twelve counts were…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. People v. McFarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. People v. CardenasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. In re CulbrethCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People v. PriceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  2. People v. BlevinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. People v. EberhardtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. People v. AubreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. People v. SantanaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API