Legal Opinion

United States v. Stein

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 16, 2007No. S1 05 Crim. 0888(LAK)PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KAPLAN, District Judge.

Table of Contents

I. Introduction.394

II. The Factual Bases of the Court’s Constitutional Holdings.

A. The Thompson Memorandum.

1. The Text!.

2. The Bar’s Understanding of the Thompson Memorandum(a) Former U.S. Attorney General Edwin Meese III_(b) KPMG Lead Counsel Robert Bennett.(c) ABA President Karen J. Mathis.(d) The American College of Trial Lawyers.(e) The United States Chamber of Commerce:.(f) Law Review Articles.

B. The Thompson Memorandum and the USAO’s Actions Caused KPMG to Limit and Then Cut Off Payment of Fees. o o

1. The Thompson Memorandum Influenced KPMG…

2Cases cited38 opinions

Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

Seegmiller v. LaVerkin CityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
United States v. SteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
Robert Krogmann v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
Xl Specialty Insurance v. Level Global InvestorsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. DunnDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.