Legal Opinion

Lonnergan v. Stansbury

California Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1913No. L.A. No. 2868PublishedCited by 11 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

Plaintiff was a teamster employed by defendants, a contracting firm. His horses ran away. He was thrown from the wagon in which he was riding and sustained injuries. His action for damages against his employers resulted in a verdict and judgment in his favor. From that judgment and from the order denying their motion for a new trial the defendants appeal.

The gravamen of the complaint lies in the allegation that defendants furnished to plaintiff a wagon that was dangerous and unfit to be used, in that there was no brake or other appliance provided by means of which the wagon could be impeded…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Melone v. Sierra Ry. Co. of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Limberg v. Glenwood Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Hersperger v. Pacific Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1906
  4. Sterne v. Mariposa Commercial & Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Estate of HamptonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. Shook v. BealsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. Towne v. GodeauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  4. Shook v. BealsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. Martin v. City of StocktonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API