State v. Wulff
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDonald W. Steinmetz, J.
¶1. The issue in this case is whether the evidence was sufficient to convict the defendant, Brian C. Wulff, of the version of the offense the jury was instructed to deliberate, attempted second-degree sexual assault by attempted genital or anal intrusion.
¶ 2. We hold that there was insufficient evidence presented at trial to support a finding of guilt on attempted vaginal or anal intrusion. We therefore reverse the court of appeals' decision and remand to the circuit court with instructions to enter a judgment of acquittal based on United States v. Burks, 437 U.S. (1978). In Burks, the Court…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Griffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Chiarella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Rewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. Courtney C. BeamonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. Maltese Lavele WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. SearcyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005
- State v. TorresConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- State v. BeamonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.