Legal Opinion

State v. Beamon

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided August 31, 2011No. 2010AP2003-CRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUBAUER, PJ.

¶ 1. Courtney C. Beamon appeals his conviction for fleeing or eluding an officer, *441contrary to Wis. Stat. § 346.04(3) (2009-10),1 as a habitual criminal. Beamon contends that there was insufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he was guilty of fleeing or attempting to elude an officer based on the instructions provided to the jury. It is undisputed that the instructions erroneously required an additional finding of fact not essential to the offense. Thus, the issue on appeal is whether this legally inaccurate instruction becomes the law of the case for purposes…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Pope v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. State v. HarveyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. Courtney C. BeamonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. DadyNebraska Supreme Court · 2019
  3. State v. Courtney C. BeamonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State v. Courtney C. BeamonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
  5. State v. Courtney C. BeamonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API