Legal Opinion

Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co. v. Thompson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 2010No. 20090250PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Company appealed from the district court’s judgment ordering Grinnell to provide coverage or indemnification to Shelly Thompson with regard to a collision between a semi-trailer owned by Foltz Trucking, Inc. and a vehicle driven by Shelly Thompson. The district court also ordered Grinnell to defend Shelly Thompson against any actions arising out of the collision. Finally, the district court declared Foltz, FBF Leasing, Inc., Gary Johnson, or Continental Western Insurance Company have, or could have, claims against Grinnell arising…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Wildman v. Government Employees Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. BuffettaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  3. Hughes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Jenkins v. Mayflower Insurance ExchangeArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  5. State v. BrownNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Allen Bradley ClaySupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
  2. Tibert v. Nodak Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Stark County v. 1998 Peterbuilt Truck, VIN: 1NPFXB9X8WD470613North Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State v. DengNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co. v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API