Eco Manufacturing LLC v. Honeywell International, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY ON DEPENDANT’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
HAMILTON, District Judge.
I. Introduction
Defendant Honeywell International, Inc. has moved for a preliminary injunction barring plaintiff Eco Manufacturing LLC from manufacturing and selling a round thermostat. ' Honeywell contends that Eco’s round thermostat violates Honeywell’s trademark rights. The court heard evidence and argument on May 19 through 21, 2003, and now states its findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Rules 52 and 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. All findings of fact and conclusions of law are based…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Roland MacHinery Company v. Dresser Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Samara Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Eco Manufacturing LLC v. Honeywell International Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- McKinnon v. Honeywell International, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
- Asics Corp. v. Target Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2003
- Wright v. Honeywell International, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2009
- C5 Medical Weeks, LLC v. CeramTec GmbHDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.